|
Makita 9227CY 10 Amp 7-Inch Variable Speed Electronic Sander/Polisher
|
MSRP: $348.00
Your Price: $206.90
Savings: $ 141.10 ( 41% )
Shipping: Usually ships in 5 to 7 days
Manufacturer: Makita
Prices subject to change. Please verify price during checkout.
|
|
Makita 9227CY 10 Amp 7-Inch Variable Speed Electronic Sander/Polisher Features
|
7-inch electronic variable speed polisher with an integrated side handle for horizontal work
Pre-set speed setting dial (from 600-3,000 RPM) for maximum control; electronic speed control maintains constant speed under load
Easily converts to a sander; lock-on button for continuous use at 1 speed; 3-prong plug
Includes sanding disc, rubber pad, lock nut, lock nut wrench, and side handle
Tool weighs 6.6 pounds; 1-year manufacturer's warranty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Makita 9227CY 10 Amp 7-Inch Variable Speed Electronic Sander/Polisher Information
|
This polisher is fast and powerful for clear coat finishes, and fantastic for ultraslow polishing, too. Its variable-speed feature with a preset maximum speed dial (from 600 to 3,000 rpm) gives you maximum control for buffing applications. The electronic speed control maintains constant speed under load. Best of all, this tool converts from polisher to sander in a snap. For continuous use at one speed, just click the lock-on button and you¿re ready to sand for hours. Your polisher purchase includes hook-and-loop pad, hex wrench and traditional polishing handle. Shown with optional buffing bonnet.
|
|
|
What Customers Say About Makita 9227CY 10 Amp 7-Inch Variable Speed Electronic Sander/Polisher:
|
|
The Best Worth every dime. This is a great product. It's a work horse.
So, after some discussion Amazon agreed to credit my account the amount of money necessary to buy the backing pad. After contacting Makita and getting no where, Amazon agreed to send me another buffer. The buffer really worked great when I finally got to use it. It did not come as advertized with the hook and loop backing pad. Unfortunately for me, it too came packaged incorrectly.
|
|
 |
|
|
